Emily Appleton vs Fiona Crawley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the statistics from the last six months, Appleton has demonstrated superior second serve performance by winning 42.82% of points, compared to Crawley, who has won 34.78% of their second serve points. This particular statistic often correlates highly with the likelihood of a match outcome, providing insight into potential predictions.

In terms of return game statistics, Crawley outperformed Appleton, winning 52.33% of return points on their opponent's second serve, while Appleton secured 48.52%. On first serve returns, Crawley's success rate stands at 34.29% compared to Appleton's 24.7%. These figures are typically critical for forecasting which player may be favored in their head-to-head matchup.

When under pressure, illustrated by their ability to save breakpoints, Appleton has a saving rate of 58.22% against Crawley's 45.88%, a factor that can influence in-game betting predictions. Breakpoint conversion rates further showcase Crawley's efficiency, having converted 42.72% of opportunities, while Appleton has managed to convert only 26.45%.

Looking at the overall performance over the past year, Appleton has won 56.14% of matches (W/L record of 32/25), whereas Crawley has achieved a higher winning percentage at 60% (W/L 15/10). This provides a broad perspective on their overall head-to-head prediction. For both players, the surface performance influences strategic decisions, with Appleton having a preferable win percentage of 57% on Indoor Hard courts, contrasting with Crawley's 71% win rate on Hard courts.

Further comparison of players' levels shows that Appleton has played 59.57% of their matches on Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving a W/L of 28/19, while Crawley has played 44.44% of their matches in similar competitions (W/L 8/10). The quality of opposition faced is also a noteworthy aspect, as Appleton has played against higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 323.42, whereas Crawley's opposition averaged a rank of 495.68.

A significant factor for deciding matches is performance in deciding sets, with Crawley slightly edging out Appleton by winning 50% of deciding sets, compared to Appleton's win rate of 45%. Evaluating their current event stats can also provide insights into the player's form; therefore, earlier performances should be assessed when considering the outcome.

Considering the amalgamation of these statistics, Crawley's consistent performance in return games, proficient breakpoint conversion, and strong surface win percentage suggest a favorable matchup over Appleton. With these insights, Crawley is projected to have the upper hand in this encounter.